<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Singled Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codex.grimoire.ca/2009/03/10/singled-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codex.grimoire.ca/2009/03/10/singled-out/</link>
	<description>Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 05:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://codex.grimoire.ca/2009/03/10/singled-out/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codex.grimoire.ca/?p=78#comment-163</guid>
		<description>yup :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Grimoire &#187; Singling Out to Spring</title>
		<link>http://codex.grimoire.ca/2009/03/10/singled-out/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>The Grimoire &#187; Singling Out to Spring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codex.grimoire.ca/?p=78#comment-162</guid>
		<description>[...] Last time, I wrote about why Singletons get a bad rap, and I wrote some high-level advice for moving away from them sanely. I want to cover a practical (if somewhat idealistic) example using Java and Spring to move a Singleton creation dependency out of a class.  First, a quick terminology aside. The term &#8220;Singleton&#8221; is actually drawn from set theory, where it means &#8220;a set with only one element&#8221;. The set of integers that equal 5 is a singleton. The analogy is that types (which are sets of values) that are Singletons also only have one value (the Singleton instance). This has caused a bit of confusion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last time, I wrote about why Singletons get a bad rap, and I wrote some high-level advice for moving away from them sanely. I want to cover a practical (if somewhat idealistic) example using Java and Spring to move a Singleton creation dependency out of a class.  First, a quick terminology aside. The term &#8220;Singleton&#8221; is actually drawn from set theory, where it means &#8220;a set with only one element&#8221;. The set of integers that equal 5 is a singleton. The analogy is that types (which are sets of values) that are Singletons also only have one value (the Singleton instance). This has caused a bit of confusion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
